Which of the following is NOT a requirement to be charged with trespassing under Penal Code 602 K?

The correct choice reflects the understanding that trespassing involves entering or remaining on private property without the owner’s permission. In the context of Penal Code 602 K, one of the fundamental elements of trespassing is the unauthorized entry onto land, which occurs when an individual does not have permission from the landowner. Therefore, express permission from the landowner is not a requirement for being charged with trespassing; rather, the lack of it is what constitutes the offense.

In addition to this, the other elements listed do relate to various aspects of trespassing. For instance, entering land without permission is a core component of the offense, and having the intent to cause injury to property can be associated with specific types of trespassing charges. Importantly, being on private property without authorization forms the basis for potential legal action in cases of trespassing. Thus, the presence of explicit, documented consent from the landowner is the aspect that differentiates lawful presence from unlawful trespass; its absence warrants the charge, while its presence absolves the individual of wrongdoing.